He added that he felt the expedited administrative turnaround the petitioners placed on County Council was “untimely, or almost purposely untimely.” “Both of these communities are in my district, and both of these communities soundly reject the annexation, regardless of the legal arguments that have been placed in front of us,” Gallagher said. This has gone on for years.”ĭistrict 5 County Council Representative Michael Gallagher spoke just prior to the vote. “We would appreciate this finally being put to rest. “No one wants this development as proposed. Hollo is free to develop his land according to the Olmsted Township Master Plan (that requires much larger lots in rural areas, thus far fewer homes) … but Mr. Mary Vedda, an Olmsted Township resident, also spoke. The Hollos subsequently filed a new annexation petition June 16.Īttorney Thomas Ritzert addressed County Council on behalf of the Hollos and the developer, while attorney Todd Hunt summarized Berea’s position. Real estate taxes generated by each of the estimated $500,000 homes would have gone to Olmsted Township. Under the reduced plan, they still sought to tie into Berea’s city services and infrastructure, such as sewer, water, street maintenance and safety forces. They had withdrawn a petition in 2019 seeking to develop the land for more than 200 homes after being met with staunch opposition from both communities. Hollo, along with Builders and Developers Co., presented information last September that reduced the number of proposed homes to 162.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |